SEO and GEO Audit Report for boseo.ai — Updated for 2026

Free combined SEO and GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) audit for https://boseo.ai. This report scores on-page technical SEO, content quality, site structure, performance, AI readability, E-E-A-T authority, citations, and content freshness.

Summary

Overall SEO score: 73/100 (grade C). Overall GEO score: 64/100 (grade D). Overall WCAG accessibility score: 89/100 (grade B). Combined visibility score: 75/100 (grade C). Report generated on August 13, 2026.

SEO category scores

Technical SEO: 89/100 — crawlability, indexability, HTTPS, robots.txt, sitemap.
Content quality: 46/100 — titles, meta descriptions, headings, alt text.
Site structure: 88/100 — internal linking, breadcrumbs, URL hygiene.
Performance: 75/100 — load time, TTFB, Core Web Vitals.

GEO category scores

AI readability: 74/100 — structured data, answer-first content, llms.txt, AI bot access.
Authority (E-E-A-T): 62/100 — author information, organization schema, credentials.
Citations: 43/100 — external sources, references, statistics.
Freshness: 71/100 — publication and modification dates.

WCAG accessibility category scores

Perceivable: 83/100 — alt text, language declaration, media alternatives.
Operable: 100/100 — landmarks, skip links, form labels, link purpose.
Understandable: 100/100 — page title, heading hierarchy, readable structure.
Robust: 60/100 — valid markup, ARIA, table headers, iframe titles.

What is GEO?

GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) is the practice of optimizing websites so AI systems like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Overviews can discover, understand, and cite your content. Unlike traditional SEO, which focuses on ranking in search results, GEO focuses on citation readiness — clear structure, factual density, schema markup, and authority signals.

Top prioritized recommendations

Many broken links (critical): Urgently fix broken links - they negatively impact SEO.
Duplicate ID attributes (critical): Ensure every id attribute is unique within each page.
Partial English translation (warning): Add English translations for all pages, especially product descriptions. This improves international SEO and AI visibility.
LCP needs improvement (warning): Optimize hero images, reduce render-blocking resources and improve server response for the LCP element.
No links to external sources (warning): Add links to research and reports.
Duplicate titles (warning): Each page should have a unique title.
Brand name missing from title and H1 (warning): Align the homepage title and H1 with your schema entity name so humans and AI parsers see the same brand.
Some pages missing lang attribute (warning): Declare the document language on every page with a lang attribute on <html>.

Pages analyzed

This audit crawled 31 pages including the homepage and linked internal URLs.

Related resources

Author: project maintainer. Methodology published at https://seo-geo-reports.com/methodology. Last updated 2026.

HistoryPermanent result link

Share your results📤Share on LinkedIn 𝕏Share on X

This report uses an older scoring algorithm (v2.0.0)

The current version is v2.1.0. Re-run the audit to get results based on our latest checks and weights.

SEO-GEO

Website Analysis Report

Report generated on: August 13, 2026 at 05:38 AM

Analyzed Website

https://boseo.ai

Open site

SEO

73/100

GEO

64/100

WCAG

89/100

Combined Score

C (75/100)

Recommendations

2 Critical7 Warnings14 Info23 Total

10 Quick wins13 Larger projects

Analysis time: 28577ms · Pages crawled: 31

Scoring algorithm v2.0.0· outdated

All Recommendations23

Quick wins (10)

Lower effort fixes you can ship quickly for a visible score boost.

warning[seo]

Pages without title

2 of 31 pages are missing a title.

Affected pages (2)

💡 Add unique titles to all pages.

info[seo]

Some pages missing canonical tag

2 of 31 pages are missing the canonical tag.

Affected pages (2)

💡 Add canonical tag to all pages.

info[seo]

Images without alt text

21 of 59 images (36%) are missing alt attribute.

💡 Add descriptive alt text to all images.

info[seo]

Thin content pages detected

6 of 31 pages have fewer than 300 words.

Affected pages (6)

💡 Expand thin pages with substantive, unique content or consolidate them with canonical redirects.

info[geo]

No question-style headings

No H2/H3 heading is phrased as a question users actually ask.

💡 Phrase key headings as natural questions (e.g. "How do I…?") to match conversational AI queries.

info[geo]

No Speakable schema

No speakable markup found — voice assistants and some AI parsers use it to extract quotable passages.

💡 Consider Schema.org SpeakableSpecification on key answer sections.

info[seo]

Pages without meta description

2 of 31 pages are missing meta description.

Affected pages (2)

💡 Add unique meta descriptions to all pages.

info[seo]

Pages without H1 heading

2 of 31 pages are missing H1.

Affected pages (2)

💡 Add an H1 heading to each page.

info[seo]

Missing or few breadcrumbs

Only 12 of 31 pages have breadcrumbs.

Affected pages (19)

💡 Add breadcrumb navigation to all pages.

info[geo]

No table of contents

No page has a table of contents.

💡 Add table of contents to longer articles.

Larger projects (13)

Higher-impact improvements that may need more development or content work.

critical[seo]

Many broken links

Found 8 broken internal links.

Affected pages (3)

💡 Urgently fix broken links - they negatively impact SEO.

critical[wcag]

Duplicate ID attributes

4 duplicate id value(s) found (WCAG 4.1.1 Parsing).

Affected pages (4)

💡 Ensure every id attribute is unique within each page.

warning[seo]

Partial English translation

12 of 31 pages lack English translations.

Affected pages (12)

💡 Add English translations for all pages, especially product descriptions. This improves international SEO and AI visibility.

warning[seo]

LCP needs improvement

Largest Contentful Paint (lab, mobile): 2.93s. Target: under 2.5s.

Affected pages (1)

https://boseo.ai

💡 Optimize hero images, reduce render-blocking resources and improve server response for the LCP element.

warning[geo]

No links to external sources

AI values content backed by external sources.

💡 Add links to research and reports.

warning[seo]

Duplicate titles

Found 12 duplicate titles across different pages.

Affected pages (24)

and 4 more

💡 Each page should have a unique title.

warning[geo]

Brand name missing from title and H1

Schema defines "Bartosz Olszewski" but neither the page title nor the main H1 clearly reflect that name.

💡 Align the homepage title and H1 with your schema entity name so humans and AI parsers see the same brand.

warning[wcag]

Some pages missing lang attribute

2 of 31 pages lack a lang attribute.

💡 Declare the document language on every page with a lang attribute on <html>.

info[geo]

Few quantified facts in content

Less than 20% of pages contain concrete numbers, units or ISO dates in body text.

💡 Include specific figures, dates and units — AI answers prefer citeable, verifiable facts.

info[geo]

No sameAs entity links

Schema.org has no sameAs links to external profiles (LinkedIn, Wikipedia, Crunchbase).

💡 Add a sameAs array linking your Organization/Person to authoritative profiles to strengthen the entity graph AI engines rely on.

info[geo]

Inconsistent brand naming

The page title, H1 and/or og:site_name use different brand names — this weakens entity clarity for AI knowledge graphs.

💡 Use the same brand name everywhere: schema name, <title>, H1 and og:site_name should match.

info[geo]

No quotations

Attributed quotations make passages more citable for AI engines.

💡 Add relevant quotations (<blockquote>) with clear attribution.

info[geo]

No links to authoritative sources

Links to .gov, .edu, Wikipedia increase trust.

💡 Add links to official sources.

Executive Summary

SEO Categories

Category	Score
Technical SEO	B (89)
Content Quality	F (46)
Site Structure	B (88)
Performance	C (75)

GEO Categories

Category	Score
AI Readability	C (74)
Authority (E-E-A-T)	D (62)
Citations & Sources	F (43)
Content Freshness	C (71)

WCAG Categories

Category	Score
Perceivable	B (83)
Operable	A (100)
Understandable	A (100)
Robust	D (60)

SEO Analysis Details

Technical SEO

Metric	Value
HTTPS/SSL	Yes
Mobile Friendly	Yes
Canonical Tags	No
Sitemap	Yes
Robots.txt	Yes
Hreflang	Yes
Broken Links	8
Accessibility score	100/100

Content Quality

Metric	Value
Page Title	Yes (42 chars)
Meta Description	Yes (177 chars)
H1 Heading	Yes (1 found)
Heading Structure	Good
Avg Word Count	668
Thin pages (<300 words)	6 (19%)
Content language (homepage)	PL
HTML lang	pl
Images Without Alt	21
Open Graph	Yes
Twitter Cards	Yes

Site Structure

Metric	Value
Internal Links	426
External Links	12
Breadcrumbs	No
Max Depth	2 levels
Orphan Pages	0
Avg URL Length	29 chars

Performance

Metric	Value
Load Time	0.06s
TTFB	51ms
Page Size	34 KB
Compression	Enabled
Caching	Enabled
Image Optimization	86/100
LCP (lab, mobile)	2.93s
CLS (lab)	0.015
INP (lab)	26ms
Lighthouse Performance	94/100

GEO Analysis Details

AI Readability

Metric	Value
Structured Data (JSON-LD)	Yes
Schema Types	Person, PostalAddress, CollegeOrUniversity, EducationalOccupationalCredential, Organization, Country, ProfessionalService, GeoCoordinates, City, AdministrativeArea, WebSite, Service, Offer, FAQPage, Question, Answer, BreadcrumbList, ListItem, Article, WebPage
FAQ Schema	Yes
HowTo Schema	No
Article Schema	Yes
Table of Contents	No
Summary Section	Yes
Lists Count	68
Tables Count	2
Content Clarity	82/100
Readability (Flesch)	24/100
Avg. sentence length	69 chars
Sentences (homepage)	60
Headings (H2/H3)	15
Max paragraph length	269 chars
Answer-first sections	80%
Question-style headings	0
Speakable schema	No
Glossary / definitions	Yes
Pages with quantified facts	4
Unique schema types	20

AI Crawler Access

Metric	Value
robots.txt present	Yes
llms.txt present	Yes
AI crawlers blocked	None

Authority (E-E-A-T)

Metric	Value
Author Information	Yes
Author Schema	Yes
Organization Schema	Yes
About Page	No
Contact Information	Yes
Social Profiles	No
Credentials/Expertise	Yes
sameAs entity links	No
Entity clarity	25/100
Schema entity name	Bartosz Olszewski

Citations & Sources

Metric	Value
External Links	12
Authority Site Links	0
References Section	Yes
Statistics/Data	169
Quotes/Blockquotes	0

Content Freshness

Metric	Value
Publish Date	2026-05-01
Last Modified	Yes
Content Age	104 days
Mentions 2026	Yes
News Schema	No

WCAG Accessibility Analysis

Static HTML audit aligned with WCAG 2.x POUR principles. Color contrast, keyboard navigation and focus order require manual or browser-based testing.

Perceivable

Metric	Value
Images with alt text	100%
Images missing alt	0
Page language (lang)	pl

Operable

Metric	Value
Main landmark	Yes
Navigation landmark	Yes
Skip-to-content link	Yes
Unlabeled form inputs	0
Links without text	0
Buttons without name	0

Understandable

Metric	Value
Page title	Yes (42 chars)
H1 count (homepage)	1
Valid heading hierarchy	Yes
Pages with lang attribute	29/31

Robust

Metric	Value
Duplicate IDs	4
Tables without headers	0
Iframes without title	0
ARIA without role	0

AI Engine Readiness

How ready your site is to be cited by each major generative engine. Most GEO tactics help everywhere, but each engine has its own tilt.

ChatGPT

A (100)

✓OpenAI crawlers allowed (GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot)
✓Structured data (JSON-LD) present
✓Sections lead with a direct answer
✓Strong authority signals (E-E-A-T)

ChatGPT search relies on Bing's index — make sure your site is indexed in Bing.

Perplexity

A (100)

✓PerplexityBot allowed
✓Content is fresh / recently updated
✓Concrete statistics and data
✓Cites external sources

Perplexity rewards recency and concrete, citable facts over marketing copy.

Google AI Overviews

A (100)

✓Strong classic SEO foundation
✓Google-Extended allowed
✓Structured data (JSON-LD) present
✓Sections lead with a direct answer

AI Overviews lean on pages that already rank well in classic Google Search.

Claude

A (100)

✓Anthropic crawlers allowed (ClaudeBot, anthropic-ai)
✓llms.txt present
✓Strong authority signals (E-E-A-T)
✓Sections lead with a direct answer

Claude favors well-structured, authoritative content and llms.txt for site discovery.

Gemini

A (100)

✓Google-Extended allowed
✓Structured data (JSON-LD) present
✓FAQ or HowTo schema
✓Strong classic SEO foundation

Gemini draws heavily from Google's index and structured, question-answer content.

All AI Crawlers

Status of every known AI crawler user-agent detected in your robots.txt analysis. Blocking a bot prevents that engine from reading and citing your content.

User-agent	Provider	Access
GPTBot	OpenAI / ChatGPT	Explicitly allowed
OAI-SearchBot	OpenAI / ChatGPT	Allowed (default)
ChatGPT-User	OpenAI / ChatGPT	Allowed (default)
PerplexityBot	Perplexity	Explicitly allowed
Perplexity-User	Perplexity	Allowed (default)
ClaudeBot	Anthropic / Claude	Explicitly allowed
Claude-Web	Anthropic / Claude	Allowed (default)
anthropic-ai	Anthropic / Claude	Allowed (default)
Google-Extended	Google / Gemini	Explicitly allowed
Applebot-Extended	Apple Intelligence	Explicitly allowed
CCBot	Common Crawl	Explicitly allowed
Amazonbot	Amazon	Allowed (default)
Bytespider	ByteDance	Allowed (default)
Meta-ExternalAgent	Meta AI	Allowed (default)
cohere-ai	Cohere	Allowed (default)

"Allowed (default)" means no bot-specific rule was found — the site follows the global User-agent: * policy.

How to Measure AI Citations

Classic keyword rankings no longer capture how often AI engines recommend you. Track citation rate — the share of your target questions where your brand is mentioned or linked in an AI answer.

Sample queries manually: ask ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI Overviews the questions your customers ask, and record whether you are cited.
Track AI referral traffic in GA4: create a segment for referrals from chatgpt.com, perplexity.ai, gemini.google.com and similar AI domains.
Use a citation tracker: tools like Profound, Otterly or Peec automate citation-rate sampling across engines.
Re-run this report after changes: improving the signals above (crawler access, structured data, answer-first content, statistics, freshness) is what moves citation rate over time.

Crawled Pages31

Total pages analyzed: 31

https://boseo.ai
https://boseo.ai/uslugi/
https://boseo.ai/case-study/
https://boseo.ai/liczby/
https://boseo.ai/blog/
https://boseo.ai/manifest/
https://boseo.ai/o-mnie/
https://boseo.ai/faq/
https://boseo.ai/kontakt/
https://boseo.ai/polityka-prywatnosci/
https://boseo.ai/regulamin/
https://boseo.ai/cennik/
https://boseo.ai/case-study/studio-subtelnosci/
https://boseo.ai/uslugi
https://boseo.ai/case-study
https://boseo.ai/liczby
https://boseo.ai/blog
https://boseo.ai/manifest
https://boseo.ai/o-mnie
https://boseo.ai/faq
https://boseo.ai/kontakt
https://boseo.ai/cennik
https://boseo.ai/regulamin
https://boseo.ai/polityka-prywatnosci
https://boseo.ai/case-study/studio-subtelnosci
https://boseo.ai/blog/czym-jest-geo
https://boseo.ai/blog/aeo-checklist-2026
https://boseo.ai/blog/technical-seo-w-erze-llm
https://boseo.ai/blog/ahrefs-vs-semrush-pod-geo
https://boseo.ai/llms.txt
https://boseo.ai/robots.txt

Loading…