Sample report
This page shows what a typical audit report looks like: four pillar scores — SEO, GEO, WCAG accessibility and Security — per-category breakdowns, example issues, and prioritized recommendations. Every score is a 0–100 number with an A–F letter grade, based on more than 70 individual checks. When you run a free report with your URL, you get the full PDF and in-browser view with your real data.
Combined
75/100
Grade C — Average
SEO (search)
77/100
Grade C
GEO (AI visibility)
68/100
Grade D
WCAG (accessibility)
82/100
Grade B
Security
71/100
Grade C
Illustrative scores for a fictional site; the combined score is the average of the four pillars. Grades run A (90+), B (80–89), C (70–79), D (60–69), E (50–59), F (below 50).
Ready to see your own scores and issues?
Try it with your URLWhat’s in the report
The report opens with an overview (combined, SEO, GEO, WCAG and Security scores plus an issue summary by severity), then breaks each score down into weighted categories. See the full methodology for how every check is scored.
SEO score (search engines)
- Technical (30%) — HTTPS, indexability, canonicals, viewport, compression, broken links, sitemap, robots.txt.
- Content (30%) — titles, meta descriptions, H1s, image alt text, Open Graph, translations.
- Structure (20%) — URLs, internal linking, breadcrumbs, crawl depth, orphan pages.
- Performance (20%) — load time, TTFB, page size, compression, caching.
GEO score (AI visibility)
- AI readability (35%) — structured data, lists/tables, clarity, answer-first content, AI-crawler access.
- Authority (25%) — E-E-A-T signals: authors, credentials, Organization/Person schema.
- Citations (20%) — external references, sources, statistics, quotations.
- Freshness (20%) — publish/updated dates, content age, current-year signals.
WCAG score (accessibility)
- Perceivable (30%) — image alt text, page language, consistent lang across pages.
- Operable (30%) — landmarks, skip links, form labels, link purpose, button names.
- Understandable (25%) — page title, single H1, sequential heading hierarchy.
- Robust (15%) — unique IDs, table headers, iframe titles, valid ARIA.
Security score
- Transport (30%) — HTTPS, HTTP→HTTPS redirect, HSTS, mixed content.
- Headers (30%) — CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy, CORS.
- Content (25%) — tabnabbing, iframe sandbox, Subresource Integrity, inline JS, exposed secrets.
- Exposure (15%) — cookie flags, version disclosure, security.txt, exposed files.
It closes with a prioritized list of recommendations — the highest-impact fixes first, each with a short explanation and the affected pages.
Example issues (from the sample audit)
These match the illustrative scores above; your report will show real findings for your URL.
Missing meta description
Recommendation: Add a unique meta description (120–155 characters) that summarizes the page.
No author information
Recommendation: Add author names, bios, and credentials to strengthen E-E-A-T and citation readiness.
Missing FAQ schema
Recommendation: Add FAQ structured data so AI engines can extract question/answer pairs.
No last-modified date
Recommendation: Display a visible last-updated date to signal that content is current.
Missing Content-Security-Policy
Recommendation: Add a Content-Security-Policy header to limit which sources can load scripts, styles and other resources.
Images without alt text
Recommendation: Add descriptive alt attributes to images so screen readers and AI can interpret them (WCAG 1.1.1).
Download a sample PDF
On the homepage you can download a full sample report PDF (~15 pages) to see the exact layout and depth of the audit.
Get your free AI Search Visibility report
See your scores, issues, and prioritized fixes. No sign-up required.